Targeted Geriatric Assessment for Fast-Paced Healthcare Settings (TaGA): Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/ephels.186Keywords:
Targeted geriatric assessment (TaGA), Geriatric frailty screening, Validity and reliability study, Comprehensive geriatric assessment, FrailtyAbstract
This study aimed to describe the cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Targeted Geriatric Assessment (TaGA) and to evaluate its test–retest reliability, concurrent validity, known-groups validity, and ability to discriminate frailty. This methodological study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the TaGA was cross-culturally adapted into Turkish according to internationally accepted guidelines. In the second phase, test–retest reliability was evaluated in 29 community-dwelling older adults, while validity analyses were performed in 98 older adults. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC). Validity was examined through concurrent validity, known-groups validity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The total TaGA score demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability, with an ICC (2,1) of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.817–0.959). Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.912 and 0.929, respectively. The SEM and MDC were calculated as 0.038 and 0.105, respectively. Concurrent validity analyses showed that the total TaGA score was significantly associated, in the expected direction, with the Clinical Frailty Scale, FRAIL Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, Barthel Index, Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini Nutritional Assessment, and the number of medications. In the known-groups validity analysis, frail participants had significantly higher TaGA scores than non-frail participants. ROC analysis demonstrated good discriminative ability for frailty, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.857, an optimal cutoff score of 0.350, a sensitivity of 85.7%, and a specificity of 75.3%. These findings indicate that the Turkish version of the TaGA is a reliable and valid instrument for the rapid screening of geriatric risks and frailty among older adults.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Eurasia Proceedings of Health, Environment and Life Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

